Platforms moved in weeks, not quarters.
The agentic migration toolchain behind the Banyan Method. Five modules take the repetitive lift out of a replatform, from platform extraction to cutover, while senior engineers keep the judgment.
TBSCG develops software from recurring problems in live client work: migration, brand conformance, analytics and conversational journeys. Each product is supported by the engineers who built it.
None of these started life as a product plan. Each one was working code on a client problem first, and the verdict on each is the one the platform gave it.
Platforms moved in weeks, not quarters.
The agentic migration toolchain behind the Banyan Method. Five modules take the repetitive lift out of a replatform, from platform extraction to cutover, while senior engineers keep the judgment.
what the site is doing, live in days.
Site analytics inside the Magnolia authoring environment. Content performance, journey signals and authoring-time insight, surfaced where publishing decisions are actually made.
Every acquired page on brand, with an audit trail.
The post-acquisition brand-conformance sweep. Scion works through an acquired portfolio, finds what is off brand, brings it into line, and keeps a record of every change it makes.
The complex journey guided, not abandoned.
The guided-journey agent behind work for a major insurer and Nikon: conversational servicing and product discovery, built into the production platform.
We do not build products in a lab and go looking for problems. The pipeline runs the other way: a tool earns its way out of an engagement, and only then does it get a name, a license and a roadmap.
Every tool starts as working code on a real client problem, written because the engagement needed it, not because a roadmap said so.
Proof: running on a production platform before it has a name
Before anything ships, two questions get answered honestly: does it hold up beyond the platform it was built on, and do enough platforms share the problem.
Gate: technical and market review
Licensing and procurement options vary by tool and market. Contact TBSCG for the current route.
Each tool has a named owner, a release cadence and a roadmap fed by every engagement it runs on. The practice keeps it honest.
Owner: the practice that built it
Tools begin in real delivery work, pass a viability review and become supported products with their own roadmap.
Products, with a service history. Each tool was built inside a client engagement and hardened on a production platform before it carried a product name. They are licensed as software with a roadmap, and the practice that built them still runs them on engagements every week.
If you want them. Every tool feeds a named practice service, so you can license the software on its own or take it with the senior engineers who built it. Most clients start with the practice service and keep the tool; some license the tool directly for their own teams.
Licensing is shaped to the platform, not a seat count, and pricing is on request while the AWS Marketplace listings complete. Talk to us with the size and shape of your platform and we will give you a straight answer.
Licensing and procurement options vary by tool and market. Contact TBSCG for the current route.
No. The tools automate extraction, generation, monitoring and analysis; senior engineers remain responsible for architecture, review and delivery decisions.
Either way you get software that has already survived a production platform. Tell us what your platform is carrying and we will tell you which tool, or which service, fits.